Hello Terry, I'm sorry I had to leave in the middle of your presentation. First of all, your presentation is beautiful in terms of color scheme, scale and line weight. It's very clear and appealing. I think you can consider adding titles to the poster with the small graphs, this way it will be easy to understand what is the purpose of each graph. Is the wind-section in scale? it looks as if the buildings are too high compared to the space between them, other than this, this is an important section, and a very important analysis. Today, big firms have started to produce these kinds of analysis with complicated computer software. The sun/shade scheme is very interesting and I'm glad you've done it. In the material survey map, you should mark the cemetery, so it is obvious where our site is, you can do it by highlight the border line or by coloring the area a little bit with pencil color, or in any other way that you can think of. the wall sections are very good, you may want to add an approximately mark of the walls on the border line, I mean, from what point to what point we can find a specific wall. Personally I don't think there is a need to mention the scale of the sections because it's schematic, but I think other people will say they lack the scale. The sound analysis is good. I think you should also mention the stones and the tombs and their materials and sizes (approximately) on one of your maps.
Terry- Thanks for taking a stab at the sun analysis applet. It is important to understand the shadowing with accuracy rather than a fuzzy understanding. The wind and temperature diagrams are great, I think that combining them might provide you with some interesting results. I thought that the wall elevations were nice even as sketches. The noise diagram was also a good way to diagram the sounds coming from the site you did a good job of observing these characteristics in addition to the lighting.
2 comments:
Hello Terry,
I'm sorry I had to leave in the middle of your presentation.
First of all, your presentation is beautiful in terms of color scheme, scale and line weight. It's very clear and appealing.
I think you can consider adding titles to the poster with the small graphs, this way it will be easy to understand what is the purpose of each graph.
Is the wind-section in scale? it looks as if the buildings are too high compared to the space between them, other than this, this is an important section, and a very important analysis. Today, big firms have started to produce these kinds of analysis with complicated computer software.
The sun/shade scheme is very interesting and I'm glad you've done it.
In the material survey map, you should mark the cemetery, so it is obvious where our site is, you can do it by highlight the border line or by coloring the area a little bit with pencil color, or in any other way that you can think of.
the wall sections are very good, you may want to add an approximately mark of the walls on the border line, I mean, from what point to what point we can find a specific wall. Personally I don't think there is a need to mention the scale of the sections because it's schematic, but I think other people will say they lack the scale.
The sound analysis is good.
I think you should also mention the stones and the tombs and their materials and sizes (approximately) on one of your maps.
good job!
Gila
Terry- Thanks for taking a stab at the sun analysis applet. It is important to understand the shadowing with accuracy rather than a fuzzy understanding. The wind and temperature diagrams are great, I think that combining them might provide you with some interesting results. I thought that the wall elevations were nice even as sketches. The noise diagram was also a good way to diagram the sounds coming from the site you did a good job of observing these characteristics in addition to the lighting.
Post a Comment